fix off-by-10x in scale analogy for accurate shasta
This commit is contained in:
parent
02b4484fb8
commit
38dac45d85
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
|
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
||||||
title = "A Thoroughly Digital Artifact"
|
title = "A Thoroughly Digital Artifact"
|
||||||
slug = "a-thoroughly-digital-artifact"
|
slug = "a-thoroughly-digital-artifact"
|
||||||
date = "2023-01-19"
|
date = "2023-01-19"
|
||||||
updated = "2023-01-20"
|
updated = "2023-01-21"
|
||||||
[taxonomies]
|
[taxonomies]
|
||||||
tags = ["3dprinting", "CAD", "GIS", "CNC", "art", "sundry", "proclamation", "research"]
|
tags = ["3dprinting", "CAD", "GIS", "CNC", "art", "sundry", "proclamation", "research"]
|
||||||
+++
|
+++
|
||||||
|
@ -500,10 +500,10 @@ miles tall; the actual height is a little less than that, but that's OK, the arg
|
||||||
strongly at lower height. That means the ratio of height to length is 3/700, or 0.0043-ish.
|
strongly at lower height. That means the ratio of height to length is 3/700, or 0.0043-ish.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If you had a physically accurate topographic carving of California that was a foot long, the tallest
|
If you had a physically accurate topographic carving of California that was a foot long, the tallest
|
||||||
peak on the carving would be 0.0043 feet high, which is about 1/200th of an inch, or about 0.13
|
peak on the carving would be 0.0043 feet high, which is about 1/20th of an inch, or about 1.3
|
||||||
millimeters. You'd probably be able to tell with your fingers and maybe even your eyes where Shasta was,
|
millimeters. You'd probably be able to see and feel where Shasta was, and see that there was a faint
|
||||||
and see that there was a faint line from the Sierra Nevadas, but that would be it. That's why it's
|
line from the Sierra Nevadas, but that would be it. That's why it's so hard to see the details in
|
||||||
so hard to see the details in the <a href="#raw-dem">raw elevation data</a> geotiff.
|
the <a href="#raw-dem">raw elevation data</a> geotiff.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In order to be able to see any detail, and to meet expectations about what a topographic carving is
|
In order to be able to see any detail, and to meet expectations about what a topographic carving is
|
||||||
supposed to look like, the height of the highest peaks needs to be scaled up by something like
|
supposed to look like, the height of the highest peaks needs to be scaled up by something like
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue